Ratan Tata, not professional board, was running Tata Group: Mistry to SC

The Tata group was not run by professionally managed boards but by the Chairman of Tata Trusts, Ratan Tata, through the Trust nominated directors on Tata Sons board, C A Sundaram, the counsel for the Mistry family, informed the Supreme Court today.

Tata Sons owns several listed companies running into Rs 65 trillion with public shareholders and there should be some kind of independence in decision making by the group companies, Sundaram said today. “If they (Tata Sons) wanted to keep it a family affair, then they should have remained so instead of making it public,” he said.

Tata Trusts, which owns 66 per cent stake in Tata Sons, is chaired by Tata, the patriarch of the group while the Mistry family owns 18.4 per cent stake in the company.

Sundaram said a public charitable trust cannot legally run such companies and that’s the reason why Tata Sons needs it be board run. They cannot use the Articles of Association of Tata Sons to claim that they have absolute right over affairs of the company, he said.

ALSO READ: Azim Premji calls Covid-19 a magnifying glass for structural injustices

The Articles of Association of Tata Sons have come into sharp focus which gives veto powers to Trust nominated directors on Tata Sons board even if Trusts’ stake falls to 40 per cent. The Tata group counsel, Harish Salve had said in the past, the Mistry family have voted for the change in the articles of associations and they started complaining only after Cyrus Mistry, the scion of the Mistry family, was removed as the Chairman of Tata group in October 2016.

To this, Sundaram said the SP group voted in favour of Articlesdue to the relationship of trust they had with Tata Sons and they could not have conceived that the same articles would be used against them.

The Supreme Court is hearing an appeal filed by the Tata group against an order by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) last December. The NCLAT order had reinstated Cyrus Mistry as Tata group chairman, while terming his successor N Chandrasekaran’s appointment as illegal.

A bitter legal and public battle between the two sides erupted when Mistry was removed from Tata Sons board as its chairman in October 2016. While the NCLT Mumbai sided with the Tatas, the NCLAT had termed Mistry’s removal as illegal. The matter is now in the Supreme Court.

The hearing will continue tomorrow

Dear Reader,

Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.

We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor